A researcher at the University of Washington is at the center of a growing controversy after posting a chilling message on social media. The comment, directed at a prominent conservative voice, invoked the name of a man currently charged with attempted assassination.
Mara Maughan, identified as research staff within the university’s microbiology department, posted “May there be tyler robinsons for you all” in response to a Facebook post by Corey DeAngelis, Executive Director of the Educational Freedom Institute. Tyler Robinson is accused of attempting to assassinate conservative activist Charlie Kirk, adding a deeply disturbing layer to Maughan’s statement.
DeAngelis, reacting to the post, expressed serious concern over the normalization of political violence. He argued that such rhetoric fuels a dangerous environment, particularly within academic institutions, and demands accountability for those who promote it.
Maughan’s position at the university is union-based, with similar roles in the immunology department reportedly earning between $4,000 and $5,000 per month, including benefits. Her university profile also lists dedicated office space within the Department of Microbiology.
In a separate, earlier Facebook post, Maughan described herself as an autistic, transgender vaccine scientist, stating that her experiences had “turned me into the joker.” This personal detail emerged as the controversy surrounding her comments intensified.
Accuracy in Media, an organization investigating radicalism at UW, stated that the incident was not surprising, given the university’s history. They allege a pattern of tolerance for both violence and violent rhetoric from students and staff.
The organization’s president called for a revocation of federal funding to the university, citing a disconnect between stated opposition to violence and actual institutional actions. They believe the university has repeatedly failed to address concerning behavior.
When contacted for comment, the University of Washington issued a statement denouncing violence and stating that the matter was under review. The university pledged to examine the facts, relevant policies, and applicable laws to determine appropriate next steps.
DeAngelis, however, expressed dissatisfaction with the university’s initial response, characterizing it as a “boilerplate statement” lacking substance. He emphasized that genuine denunciation of violence requires concrete disciplinary action against Maughan and a commitment to preventing similar incidents in the future.
The situation has ignited a debate about the boundaries of free speech, the responsibility of academic institutions, and the potential consequences of escalating political rhetoric. The university’s response will likely be scrutinized as it navigates this complex and sensitive issue.
