BIDEN'S FORMER VOICE CRACKS: SHOCKING Confession REVEALED!

A former White House spokesperson’s recent testimony revealed a stark contrast between public statements and personal experience regarding the former president’s sharpness. Ian Sams, who previously asserted the president was “sharp” and engaged “every single day,” admitted under questioning that direct interactions were surprisingly limited.

During August testimony before the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, Sams conceded he met with the president only a “handful of times” over a two-year period. This admission directly challenges his July 2024 interview on MSNBC, where he emphatically described the president as consistently insightful and actively questioning during their interactions.

The committee pressed Sams on the basis of his confident public pronouncements, questioning whether his “handful” of meetings truly informed his assessment of the president’s mental acuity. Sams confirmed those infrequent encounters were, in fact, the interactions he referenced when speaking to the president’s capabilities.

Further scrutiny revealed that many of these interactions weren’t even in person, but occurred online or via phone. Sams recalled only two actual face-to-face meetings with the president during his tenure as special assistant to the president, spokesperson, and senior advisor in the White House Counsel’s Office from 2022 to 2024.

Despite the limited contact, Sams maintained that he observed some signs of aging but had “no reason to think” the president was incapable of fulfilling his duties. He defended his earlier statements, insisting they accurately reflected his *own* experiences during those rare interactions.

Committee members challenged this defense, pointing out that five meetings in 24 months hardly constituted a comprehensive understanding of the president’s daily engagement with staff. They questioned whether his public statements intentionally misled the American people about the frequency of his access.

The House Oversight Committee highlighted the discrepancy, stating Sams met with the president only twice in over two years, yet publicly claimed consistent interaction. They accused him of deliberately deceiving the public to conceal a perceived decline in the president’s condition.

Committee Chair James Comer suggested Sams was merely reciting a pre-approved narrative, controlled by White House “handlers.” Comer characterized the situation as a significant political scandal, alleging a deliberate effort to mask the president’s diminishing capacity.

The committee’s investigation further alleges unauthorized use of an autopen to sign executive actions, potentially rendering them invalid. They are now calling for a Justice Department review of these actions and the aides involved in what they describe as a coordinated cover-up.

The committee’s report claims key aides actively colluded to mislead the public and sustain the illusion of presidential authority as the president’s ability to function independently waned. The allegations paint a picture of a White House deeply concerned with managing public perception.